Why Endless Wars

A conspiracy of the British Empire and its Aristocracy

Why seemingly endless wars? I think there is a conspiracy at work.

Yes, I happen to be a “conspiracy theorist” as defined below by Dr. David Collum.

“I am a “conspiracy theorist.” I believe men and women of wealth and power conspire. If you don’t think so, then you are what is called “an idiot.” If you believe stuff but fear the label, you are what is called “a coward.”

There are undoubtedly many conspiracies in the world. Concerning the current situation in the Middle East and Ukraine, I think the most important conspiracy is the one centered in the British aristocracy and its allies/tools in the financial matrix called the “City of London”.

I call this conspiracy the Conspiracy of the British Aristocracy (CBA).

I appreciate the careful research and analysis of the folks at Promethean Action which first led me to think about the CBA. This essay combines my own research and thinking on the subject as well as information from Promethean Action.

Disclaimer: This is the British Aristocracy’s Conspiracy—Not Regular Brits

The average Brit does not belong to the CBA. Middle- and working-class Brits are victims and tools of the CBA. They have been used and abused in that role for centuries. Working-class Brits recently threw out the Labour Party and won a battle against the CBA.

As far as the U.S. and the CBA are concerned, some history may help. Let’s start 250 years ago. I have a lot of evidence to summarize but will be as brief as I can.

Revolutionary War through the Civil War

In 1776, we told King George III to go to hell. As sovereign people, we were going to direct our own affairs. George objected. So, we had a little war. We won.

The British tried once to recover their lost American colonies by force. They provoked a war with us, the War of 1812. The Brits even invaded American soil, but we beat them again.

Britain practiced a “divide and rule” policy in its empire, particularly in India, Ireland, Nigeria, and Sri Lanka. Using “divide and rule”, Britain maintained control over vast territories by exploiting, encouraging, or fabricating religious, ethnic, and social divisions.

Please remember that.

For centuries, the CBA has dominated others by dividing them. They are now using psyops to divide the U.S. prior to our midterm elections. They fear Trump…with good reason. If Trump wins the midterm elections, the CBA will have lost the war we have been waging with them since 1776.

For those who may be unfamiliar with the word, a “psyop” is the use of propaganda, misinformation and psychological manipulation to win a struggle. Instead of using physical violence (“kinetic” force) a psyop aims to win without fighting by shattering morale, sowing confusion, and altering public perception

The CBA used opium addiction to divide, undermine and manipulate China during the “Opium Wars” (mid-1800s) and destroyed the lives of millions of human beings in China. The CBA also starved to death millions of farmers in India who were forced to grow the opium to addict China and loot China’s wealth.

The CBA has no morals and no conscience. It wants only to increase its power and wealth.

During the 1800s Britain and Russia contended for power and influence in central Asia and India in the so-called “Great Game”.

As we will see, the effects of the Great Game on British and Russian relationships and our relationships with both Britain and Russia have continued into the present day, with severe consequences for everyone concerned.

During the American Civil War, the British aristocracy wanted to recognize the Confederacy as an independent nation. Ultimately they did not, largely because working-class Brits were strongly against slavery If the Union had been destroyed, Britain might have divided and dominated America, as they were successfully doing in India at the same time.

The Great Game also played a role in our Civil War. The Federal blockade of southern ports was strangling the Confederacy. Russia sent part of its navy to New York to deter the British Navy from breaking the blockade. Russia’s intervention thereby helped preserve the Union, although Russia had its own interests at stake also.

Oil in Iran, Lloyd’s of London and the Federal Reserve-Bank of England Nexus

The U.S. grew rapidly after the Civil War and became a continental nation. Thus, British military power could never physically dominate America. Britain did retain enough military power to keep its grip on India, and on parts of China---for a while.

In 1908, oil was discovered in Persia/Iran, the first commercial-scale oil discovery in the Middle East. The Anglo-Iranian oil company (later British Petroleum, later BP) was formed to exploit this oil wealth to the benefit of Britain, leaving much less for the people of Iran.

With Iranian oil, Winston Churchill converted the British fleet to use oil, rather than coal, thereby increasing Britain’s naval power while making it totally reliant on imported oil. In short, Britain now had to control Iranian oil to ensure Britain’s own position in the world. Later oil discoveries in the Gulf region only increased the region’s importance to the CBA.

The CBA has used oil, oil cartels and oil chokepoints such as the Strait of Hormuz to advance its interests in the Gulf region. The CBA has also leveraged Lloyd’s of London, an insurance company long associated with the British Crown, to insure oil shipments from the Gulf.

Without such insurance, no shipping moves. Lloyd’s (and the CBA) collects the “terror premium”. The terror premium is the additional insurance payment extracted from shippers to move oil and other products in and out of the Gulf during conflicts.

The terror premium costs the world economy between $100 billion and $450 billion per year, or about $5 to $25 trillion dollars since the terror theocracy took over Iran in 1979. That’s a lot of loot for Lloyd’s of London…and it buys a lot of power and influence.

OK, back to the early 1900s to continue the story and bring it up to Iran in 1953.

In 1913, U.S. President Woodrow Wilson helped create the Federal Reserve banking cartel, modeled on the Bank of England. The Federal Reserve exists to benefit member banks and private financial interests…not the public. The Federal Reserve cartel, especially the New York Fed, has had a long and close relationship with the Bank of England.

World War I, the “Special Relationship”, Chatham House and World War II

Propagandists serving the administration of Woodrow Wilson and the British succeeded in bringing a reluctant America into WW I. On his way to the Paris peace talks that ended WWI (and laid the foundation for WWII), Wilson met with King George V, thus beginning the so-called “special relationship” between the British Crown and the U.S.

The “special relationship” is a term coined by Winston Churchill in 1946 in his famous “Iron Curtain” speech. The term describes the exceptionally close political, diplomatic, military, and economic partnership between the U.S. and Great Britain. Here is a good summary.

Key components of this relationship include the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing alliance (with Canada, Australia, and New Zealand) and military cooperation, often through NATO.

One of the responsibilities of the British king has been to mend or strengthen the special relationship in challenging times. The king is deployed by the elected British government to mend the special relationship. More about that below.

Britain identified and cultivated promising young Americans to foster pro-British sentiment and ensure support for British interests within the special relationship. Two closely intertwined “think tanks” were established in 1920 to implement this British agenda: Chatham House in London and the Council on Foreign Relations in New York city.

Today the primary institutional funder of Chatham House is the Open Society Foundation, created by George Soros, billionaire globalist, currency manipulator and funder of left-wing causes. Soros is very influential in the modern American Democrat party. Likewise, the American Democrat party is strongly influenced by and in sync with Chatham House/British interests.

It is a gross understatement to say that Soros opposes Trump’s policies. Soros has described Trump as a “would-be dictator” and a “con man,” characterizing his administration as a “danger to the world”.

OK, let that sink in. The chief funder of Chatham House, which strongly influences British foreign policy, thinks Trump is a danger to the world and a would-be dictator. Do you think Soros’s money influences Chatham House and the British policies it supports or proposes?

Of course it does.

As a result, we can be quite sure that anyone closely associated with the Chatham House/Council on Foreign Relations ecosystem has been influenced by British interests.

Here are four recent examples: two Presidential candidates and later Secretaries of State under Obama, John Kerry and Hilary Clinton as well as Henry Kissinger, Nixon’s Secretary of State (1973-1977) and Zbigniew Brzeziński, Carter’s National Security advisor (1977-1991). That’s quite a roster of powerful people.

How deeply were such folks influenced?

Here is just one example. In a 1982 speech at Chatham House, Kissinger said “I kept the British Foreign Office better informed and more closely engaged than I did the American State Department” [about bilateral U.S.-Soviet negotiations].

Think about that. The American Secretary of State kept the British better informed about confidential negotiations between the U.S. and the Soviet Union than he did his own American government.

The whole text of Kissinger’s speech reveals the powerful British influence on U.S. policies during the “special relationship”. If you are skeptical about this point, read Kissinger’s speech and see for yourself.

In addition to Chatham House, the CBA has also leveraged the enormous power of the United States using the media and psyops.

For example, influential American journalists including Edward Murrow and Walter Lippmann were used by British operatives to shape public opinion against American “isolationists” and promote American entry into WWII on Britain’s side.

The CBA is still using U.S. media and psyops manipulate American opinion…this time to try to take down or stop Trump. Why would they have stopped using propaganda and psyops? It has paid off very well for them so far.

Before and during WWII, Franklin Roosevelt infuriated British Prime Minister Winston Churchill by making it clear to Churchill that the U.S. would not help Britain preserve its empire. Roosevelt also believed it would be a grave mistake for the U.S., Britain and Russia, who had fought fascism together, to be divided after the war.

Instead, Roosevelt sought cooperation with Russia after WWII. However, Roosevelt died in April 1945, before his post-war policy of cooperation with Russia could be implemented. And so, America and Russia were divided…with the help of the British.

Randolph Churchill, Winston’s only son, was raised to become his father’s political heir. What did Churchill’s “heir” think about the special relationship?

Well, here it is in his words. On March 6, 1946, Randolph Churchill told Walter Lippmann (an American reporter):

“We’ll show you. You don’t understand the British Empire. Just let me tell you this. We dragged you into two wars, and we’ll drag you into the third.”

Did you get that? Randolph Churchill, Winston’s son, knew the enormous influence Britain exerted to involve the United States in two world wars.

So, Winston and Randolph, we get it. The “special relationship” exists to benefit Britain at the expense of the U.S.

Winston and the CBA weren’t done trying to manipulate the United States after WWII.

Although America, Russia and Britain had just worked together to destroy Hitler, Winston Churchill wanted America and Britain to attack Russia with the atomic bomb, an American monopoly, soon after WWII ended. Plans were even drawn up for that attack.

So, the Great Game was still in play as of 1945. The British aristocracy hated Russia then, and it hates Russia now.

Britain Loses India, Bretton-Woods, Cold War, the Rules-Based International Order and Iran

Fortunately, Churchill didn’t get his way. Instead of the hot war with Russia that Churchill wanted, we got over four decades of a Cold War with the Soviet Union instead, vigorously promoted by the CBA.

In March 1946 Winston Churchill gave his famous Iron Curtain speech at Westminster College in Missouri, in the heartland of America. This speech was effectively the “opening salvo” in the Cold War with the Soviet Union.

Remember, the British aristocracy has opposed Russia for centuries.

The CBA is fighting Russia even today, using Ukraine as a tool. Like Churchill tried to do after WWII, the CBA wants to bring the U.S. fully into the current Ukraine war against Russia.

Old habits die hard.

In 1947, India and Pakistan separated from each other and became independent of Britain. India was the “crown jewel” of the British Empire and losing it meant that the Indian subcontinent’s wealth and people could no longer be exploited (so easily) by the CBA.

India and Pakistan continue to suffer from the divisions between them that were deliberately encouraged and even created by the British. Read the search notes here to understand how this was done.

During this same immediate post-WWII period, the so-called “rules-based international order” was instituted among the liberal democracies (the US, UK, France, Canada, etc.). The rules-based order operates through the United Nations, the World Bank, the World Trade Organization, the International Monetary Fund, and other institutions.

Importantly, the rules-based order has acted under the American security umbrella, that is, NATO and the U.S. Navy to keep sea lanes open, and within the so-called Bretton-Woods agreement.

Two linchpins of the Bretton-Woods agreement were fixed currency exchange rates tied to the U.S. dollar as the world reserve (trading) currency and convertibility of the dollar to gold at a fixed rate ($35 per ounce). In contrast, the British, led by economist John Maynard Keynes, wanted Bretton-Woods to install a fiat currency managed by debtor nations such as Britain.

Instead, the gold-linked dollar system prevailed. As a result, the postwar period saw tremendous expansion of broad-based global prosperity, often called the “Thirty Glorious Years”.

In 1971 President Nixon removed the U.S. from the Bretton-Woods agreement and, in effect, installed the British system. The dollar became a fiat currency as Keynes wanted, tied to nothing of real value. Dollars could now be created at will in any amount desired. And so, dollars were created, trillions of them.

Not surprisingly, the purchasing power of the dollar has declined by about 90% since 1971. This is a direct attack on the American lower and middle classes, as well on ordinary people throughout the world.

Maintaining the aristocracy and its client upper classes by destroying the middle and lower classes is a feature of and not a glitch in the Keynesian/British currency system, the system we have had since 1971.

Nixon’s change also opened the path to finance government expenditures by debt using the Federal Reserve banking cartel to purchase Treasury bonds. This is the path we have followed ever since. As a result of Nixon’s decision, the U.S. national debt soared from about $400 billion in 1971 to $38 trillion in May 2026, a hundred-fold increase.

Since 1971, instead of broad-based increase in global (and U.S.) prosperity, money manipulators (bankers, financiers, etc.) have benefited enormously at the expense of producers and the working class. Visit the link to see all the ways asset owners/manipulators have benefited from the fiat money system.

Again, this is a feature of the system, not a glitch. The enormous inequality of wealth and income distribution results directly from fiat currencies, expanding government debt, and enabling/encouraging financial manipulators such as the CBA—and George Soros, a major funder of the Democrat party.

Now, back to Iran.

In 1953, a British MI6/CIA coup toppled popular Iranian Prime Minister Mossadegh. Why? Mossadegh wanted to nationalize the Iranian oil industry to benefit the Iranian people by reducing Britain’s take from the oil wealth.

The 1953 nationalization effort failed. Britain, assisted by the U.S., sponsored a coup against Mossadegh and then helped tighten Shah Mohammad Pahlavi’s grip on Iran using his secret police, the Savak. Americans were told that we were “fighting communism”.

This was one of the first covert/overt actions of the CBA and its U.S. allies/tools to “fight communism”. Via the special relationship, the CBA leveraged American blood and treasure for decades to serve its own interests…and made America hated in much of the world.

The Shah aggressively sought to increase Iran’s share of its oil income to benefit the people of Iran. Full nationalization of Iran’s oil finally occurred in 1973. Thus, for over 6 decades (1908-1973), the CBA pocketed much or most of Iran’s oil wealth.

In 1979, the Shah was deposed by the mullahs. Then it was Supreme Leader, high-ranking clerics and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps who got filthy rich while the Iranian people suffered. Much of the wealth of the Iranian ruling class (the theocracy and its allies) was invested in the financial hub called “The City of London”.

With the Shah’s overthrow, Britain lost direct access to Iran’s oil wealth. However, the CBA could still benefit from chaos in the Gulf region through the terror premium and financial manipulations. So, that is what they did.

During the 1980s, the CBA increased its presence and influence in the Gulf until today about 240,000 British citizens live in Dubai, the financial center of the Middle East. Percentagewise, this is far more Brits in Dubai than citizens of any other Western country.

This is significant. The CBA benefits through chaos in the Middle East to the tune of billions of dollars per year. Obviously, the CBA needs its people “on site” to manage its affairs.

Lacking military power (except when it can leverage American military might), the CBA acts through cartels to exert global leverage and advance its interests. Financial cartels allow the CBA to operate in the shadows. It can thereby further enrich itself by leveraging the riches it has plundered from the world over centuries.

The HSBC bank (formerly the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation) is by far the largest bank in England. Not coincidentally, HSBC is the bank most often cited for laundering drug money in Latin America.

Where do most of those drugs end up?

In the U.S., of course. This is the CBA’s modern version of its Opium Wars against China, only now the war is directed against the United States.

The CBA is indifferent to human misery...if it pays well. Trade in addictive drugs pays very well, in both money and power by weakening nations the CBA wants to influence or control, especially the United States.

The Cold War Ends and NATO Lies to Russia

The Cold War ended in late 1991. The Soviet Union dissolved, Germany was reunified and all the former “Soviet Republics” gained independence from Moscow.

While future expansion of NATO was not prohibited by treaty, verbal assurances ruling out future NATO expansion were given to Russia by multiple Western leaders on multiple occasions.

We lied to Russia. Despite these promises, fourteen countries have been added to NATO since 1991. The expansion of NATO is perceived by Russia to be a threat to its security interests.

With the end of the Soviet Union and the Cold War, Europe and the U.S. should not have needed such an expansive/expensive NATO. But that is not what happened. Instead, NATO expanded, and Britain has played a key role in its expansion after 1991.

Even today Britain continues to press strongly for Ukraine’s admission into NATO. Britain acknowledges that this is a “red line” for Russia but insists that Ukraine is on an “irreversible path” to membership in NATO. Admission of Ukraine to NATO would put great pressure on the United States to intervene directly in the current Ukraine war.

Let that sink in: the CBA wants more wars. Britain, safely under the U.S. security umbrella, provokes Russia all the while Britain is hollowing out its military.

As far as the CBA is concerned, the Great Game is still on as of 2026.

Designed Conflict in the Middle East and “Endless Wars” Begin

Now, at last, to the Persian Gulf, its oil and its endless wars.

First, we must ask: Why have there been so many wars in Middle East over the past 50 years or so? Here is why:

The Ottoman Empire was an ally of Germany in WWI. When Germany lost that war, Britain and France divided up the former Ottoman Empire. Britain got most of the Gulf region.

Remember Britain’s long history of “divide and rule” and the critical importance of oil to Britain? Here was a perfect opportunity to divide, rule and to keep the oil flowing to Britain.

So Britain drew the boundaries of the current Gulf states, often unilaterally, to advance its interests. When the British were done with this process, “nations” that had never existed previously now existed. At least on paper.

Iraq was created in that process. This British map helped ensure continuing conflict along tribal, religious and ethnic lines (religion: Sunni vs. Shia Muslims; Muslims vs, Jews; ethnicity: Persian vs. Arab; tribes: one desert tribe vs. another tribe).

With good reason, this map is also called “The Map that Broke the Middle East”.

There is another British-drawn map at the center of Middle East wars. During most of the 600-year long history of the Ottoman Empire, there was no separate nation of Iraq and no nation of Kuwait. They were simply part of the Ottoman Empire.

The boundaries of Kuwait were first established in 1899 under the secret Anglo (British)-Kuwaiti treaty which set up Kuwait as a British protectorate (“protected” from the Ottoman Empire). The British gained access to Kuwait’s ports—always a big factor for the Royal Navy. Later Britain got access to Kuwait’s oil under very favorable terms.

The bloody war (one million casualties) between Iran and Iraq (1980-1988) was largely due to British map-making. The war was about territorial disputes over waterways, plus ethnic (Persian vs. Arab) and religious (Sunni vs. Shia) conflicts, intensified by the British-drawn boundaries.

Likewise, when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in 1990-1991 and started the first Gulf War, he had some justification for saying that he was reclaiming Iraqi territory. The UN coalition (led by the U.S.) that expelled Iraq from Kuwait was sold to the public as necessary to enforce national boundaries.

But these were the nations created by Britain when they drew those maps in the first place. They were maps deliberately drawn to encourage war and chaos. In that, they were effective.

The second Gulf War (2001-2003) and the resulting invasion/destruction of Iraq also got help from the British. British intelligence claimed that Saddam Hussein was acquiring and possessed weapons of mass destruction. The CIA used this British intelligence in part to justify the invasion of Iraq.

Again, endless wars in the Gulf (and elsewhere) are a feature of the CBA’s divide and rule policy, not some accidental consequence, a “bug”.

NATO Gets a Do Over, The Special Relationship Ends, So Does the Rules Based International Order and the Sun (Finally) Sets on the British Empire

Two pillars of the special relationship were the Five Eyes intelligence sharing system and U.S.-Britain cooperation in global security issues, particularly under NATO. U.S. involvement in NATO is clearly being modified right now…on American terms, not British.

In July 2025, Trump stopped intelligence sharing with Britain regarding the Russia-Ukraine conflict, ending that part of the special relationship. Trump probably believes that Britain would use that intelligence to continue the war, not end it. Trump undoubtedly knows about the Great Game.

When Trump asked for help in the current war in Iran, a war which clearly affects global security, Britain would not contribute ships, probably because it cannot. Most of Britain’s blue water fleet is in drydock, needing repairs and maintenance. Britain also did not allow the U.S. to use its bases to refuel our planes, which it could have done.

Even before Britain made those decisions regarding the Iran war, it had already done a couple of stupid/arrogant things that effectively ended the special relationship.

First, about one hundred British Labour Party operatives (Britain’s then dominant political party) operatives campaigned for Kamala Harris in 2024. As the Brits say: “very bad form”, and not something Trump would forget.

Please remember: in recent decades the CBA, Chatham House, the Council on Foreign Relations and the American Democrat Party have been allied.

Second, in February 2025, shortly after Trump took office, British Prime Minister Kier Starmer appointed Lord Peter Mandelson as Britain’s ambassador to the U.S. Mandelson had previously called Trump “a danger to the world” and “little short of a white nationalist and a racist”.

Again, arrogant and stupid. And also one of the reasons Starmer recently resigned.

In the future, the U.S. and Britain will obviously work together in areas of mutual interest. But unless the policies of the Trump administration are reversed by subsequent administrations, Britain will no longer have any special place among our partner nations.

Britain obviously wants the special relationship to continue, but on British terms. When King Charles visited the U.S. in late April, he was trying to restore the special relationship.

The King failed. Here is some evidence.

1) While the King was visiting, Trump spent 90 minutes talking to Putin, the leader of Russia, Britain’s ancient adversary. This was calculated, not accidental. Trump told King Charles that he would be talking to Putin during Charles’ visit.

2) Trump and Melania took the King and the Queen to see the White House beehives. In British royal tradition, whenever there is a death in the royal family, or a change of kings, the royal bees are told. (Yes, really!) Trump was telling Charles that the old king is dead.

3) King Charles visited the U.S. in late April. Shortly thereafter, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that the new rules based order would be rebuilt out of Europe. The old, US-based international order was dead. The King supported Carney’s announcement. In effect, Carney (and King Charles) were admitting that the special relationship was dead. With it, the old European/Western-dominated world order which relied greatly on the special relationship was also dead.

So, the British Crown has shown us that their empire has little power left. The King has some sway over the British Commonwealth (effectively, Great Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand), but very little remains of the global power Britain once was.

What power it has left, it will try to exert through its conspiracy, the CBA.

So King George III was right. And King Charles III knows it. This is the Second American Revolution…and the British Empire is done, finished, kaput. (Probably, see below for more on this subject.)

What comes next? What is the new world order?

What Comes Next? Ending the Ukraine War and Forward to the New World Order

The makeup of nations involved in ending the war in Iran is probably the strongest evidence that the previous world order is dead and that a new order is emerging.

The United States and Iran have signed a Memorandum of Understanding that has been brokered significantly by Pakistan and Qatar. Key countries and regional actors involved in the conflict and negotiations include Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Israel, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan, Bahrain, and Iraq.

Notice the countries involved.

Britain has had no role, none, in either prosecuting or ending the Iran war. Despite its long interest in the Gulf and Iran, Britain has been shut out. Neither was any other European nation or Western power involved; they were all frozen out.

The inability and/or unwillingness of China and Russia to intervene directly in the recent Iran war is another strong piece of evidence that the old order is dying.

What about the Ukraine war, now in its fifth year?

Britain, and parts of the EU, obviously want Ukraine to continue its war with Russia. At every turn, they have encouraged Zelensky to keep fighting Russia rather than negotiate an end to the war.

This is depraved. With the bodies still piling up in the Ukraine war, about two million casualties total, Britain and some European nations want more deaths. They want Russia to remain as a permanent enemy of Europe and Britain.

The Great Game between Britain and Russia continues…but the CBA/Britain wants Ukrainians to suffer and die as its proxies in the fight with Russia.

In stark contrast, Trump has said that he does not believe in having “permanent enemies”. Trump wants the Ukraine war to end.

Trump has great leverage with Britain, the EU, Ukraine and Russia. In contrast, Britain and the divided EU have little leverage with the United States and almost none with Russia.

Guess how that is going to turn out?

I don’t know what Trump will do to end the Russia-Ukraine war, but I am confident he will. Ukraine and Russia are exhausted. The Ukraine war will end, probably soon.

As that war ends, a new world order will emerge. What will it look like?

The United States is a Pacific power as well as an Atlantic power—the only such nation on earth. During the past century our attention has been focused on the Atlantic. Under Trump’s leadership, we are now shifting our focus to the Pacific.

So, the outlines of the new world order are beginning to emerge.

I believe that the core nations of the new world order will be the United States, Russia, China, India and Japan. The first four countries have very negative histories of with the British Empire, further sealing the Empire’s fate. RIP Britannia.

I want to finish this long essay by discussing how Trump is moving to destroy the CBA…the last remaining center of power of the British Empire.

Destroying the CBA and Its Depraved Works

Here we must get a bit more speculative and make logical inferences from both Trump’s actions and how the CBA probably works. Britain has been plundering the world’s wealth for centuries.

How can that wealth be leveraged to maintain/extend its power?

I think the answer is obvious. The CBA has invested in existing cartels and/or created new cartels. Cartels are looting operations, a CBA specialty for centuries.

I believe Trump knows this and is systematically working to destroy a number of cartels. Trump has pledged to make America stronger, safer and more prosperous. Let’s consider a few ways that happens as cartels are destroyed.

First, oil cartels. The oil cartel known as OPEC is dead or greatly diminished. The three top oil producers in the world are the U.S., Russia and Saudi Arabia. Only Saudi Arabia is in OPEC. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) left the OPEC cartel in May. The UAE was one of the few members of OPEC with spare production capacity—critical to OPEC’s power.

Iran will need all the oil income it can get to rebuild following this war. Ditto Russia when the Ukraine war ends. So, they will ramp up their oil production and drive down prices. Indonesia, Qatar, Ecuador, Angola and Gabon have withdrawn from OPEC in recent years. Venezuela is out. OPEC power has been greatly diminished and thus world crude oil prices will trend downward, increasing prosperity in the U.S. and in the world.

Second, drug cartels. The stated purpose for removing Nicolas Maduro was his involvement in cocaine trafficking. As mentioned above, the HSBC Bank, England’s biggest bank, has been heavily fined for its central role in laundering drug money in Latin America.

As Maduro’s criminal trial unfolds, look for more evidence against the HSBC to emerge, with more fines and sanctions, and perhaps criminal prosecutions of bank personnel.

These drug and human trafficking cartels operate through or in collaboration with various criminal organizations. Eight Latin American and two Haitian organizations have been designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs), thereby opening them up to direct military/intelligence/financial operations by the U.S. and partner nations. Look for more such operations against drug lords such as El Mencho in Mexico or Nino Guerrero in Venezuela.

Unlike previous presidents, when Trump says war on drugs, he means it: real war with all the tools at our disposal. This war is fully justified. Over 1.2 million Americans have died since 2000 from drug overdoses, about twice as many as died in World War 1 and 2 combined.

Third, financial cartels. Operation Epic Fury was essentially complete after twelve days of heavy bombing against Iran. Operation Economic Fury then began.

As part of Epic Fury, U.S. Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, told his British counterpart Rachel Reeves that the U.S. would use economic tools at its disposal to go after nations providing aid to Iran. No other nation got this warning from Bessent.

Yes, the CBA is trying to stir the pot in Iran and keep the war going…just as it has done in the Gulf for over a century.

When Lloyd’s of London withdrew shipping insurance early in the Iran war, effectively stopping shipping in the Gulf, Bessent was ready again. The U.S. offered alternative insurance to oil shippers in the region.

Bessent (and Trump) were letting the CBA know that its Persian Gulf insurance cartel was finished. The Gulf will never again be an oil chokepoint, available for looting by the CBA.

The Trump administration has started to act against the Federal Reserve banking cartel through the appointment of the new Fed chair Kevin Warsh. In stark contrast to previous Fed chairs, Warsh recently gave no “forward guidance” to the markets. Forward guidance has severe negative economic consequences.

Trump has also moved significant lending authority to the Department of War (and thus away from Wall Street) for the reshoring of manufacturing capacity, critical minerals and other supply chains.

The Fed’s role in enriching Wall Street at the expense of Main Street has been emphasized by the Trump administration. If Trump’s policies are supported/upheld in the 2026 midterm elections (see below), we can expect more effects to reform or outright replace the Fed.

Fourth, other cartels. Trump has also moved to break up insurance cartels plus food and meatpacking cartels. Trump threatened pharmaceutical companies with fines if they did not provide Americans consumers with the drugs at the same prices they charge others.

Fifth, while not a business cartel, the Federal government has for many decades assumed massive powers not given it by the Constitution. This is effectively a cartel…it is concentrated power.

When that government power is exercised within the Executive Branch, it becomes largely unaccountable. Concentration of power has corrupted many sectors of our government, enriching the few at the expense of the many. Power corrupts, as it always has.

For example, the Federal government has shut down the economy (Covid), censored Americans (via pressure on social media), imposed “green energy” standards that significantly raise the cost of living and imposed vaccines via “independent” advisory boards dominated by the pharmaceutical industry.

The Federal Government has also given the Federal Reserve, an unelected, undemocratic body, the greatest of all economic powers, the power to set the “price of money” by setting interest rates. The list goes on.

The Federal government must first be shrunk in numbers to reduce its power. This is happening. Since Trump took office, the Federal workforce has shrunk by over a quarter of a million people. If the movement Trump leads wins the November midterm elections, much more can and will be done to rein in the Federal government.

Winning the Midterms—Beware the Psyops

We are in the Crisis stage in the most recent American Fourth Turning. There is much more to be done, but the trend is clear. A new world order is emerging, led by the United States, and Donald J. Trump is its leader. He is a “Gray Champion” of this Fourth Turning.

I believe that new world will be freer, more prosperous and safer as the British Empire and the Conspiracy of the British Aristocracy (CBA) are tossed into the dustbin of history.

However, the Empire and the CBA will not go without a fight. Their military and economic power are much diminished. But they can still wield the weapon they have used for centuries: “divide and rule”.

How?

Through propaganda, through various psyops, all designed to defeat the Trump coalition during the midterms this November. If you have eyes to see, you will observe these psyops everywhere. The CBA psyops aim at dividing Trump’s supporters from each other and from him, shattering our morale and sowing confusion.

But we can choose not to be divided. We can ignore the psyops, even laugh at them. We can support Trump and his policies in the 2026 midterms. We can win the Second American Revolution.

Trump has delivered on the promises made as a candidate, bigly. I trust Trump to continue doing his best. So, I will continue to support him and his agenda. I will also do my best to combat the psyops against him and the movement he leads. I invite you to do the same.

My Thanks to the Folks at Promethean Action

The good folks at Promethean Action first awakened me to the possible role of the British Empire and what I call the “Conspiracy of the British Aristocracy” in promoting endless wars. I have spent much of the past six weeks studying this possibility and am now convinced that it is real. The evidence is summarized on my Substack page (link below).

So, I invite you to join Promethean Action, watch their excellent (free) videos and, if you can, support them financially as I am doing.